Does the App Store Title Field Still Have a Stronger Impact on Rankings Than the Keywords Field?

Answer: Yes, but with some nuances.

Introduction

ASO specialists are well aware: the App Store Title field carries the most weight in the algorithm’s eyes. Keywords included in the title have a significantly greater impact on search performance compared to the same keywords placed in the Keywords field. In fact, the same keyword can produce different ranking results depending on whether it’s in the title or the keywords field.

But does this still hold true today, especially given Apple’s algorithm is constantly evolving?

Our RadASO team decided to polish up on our understanding of this phenomenon by conducting an in-house study.

Experiment

We selected three apps — Nicegram, Me QR, and OTOMOTO. We moved specific search terms from the Keywords field into the Title to assess how this shift would impact their rankings after the release.

OTOMOTO is a local app, while Nicegram and Me QR are designed for a global audience. We monitored ranking changes across multiple segments: Top-50, Top-10, and Top-5 results.

Results

Nicegram

Locale: English (U.S.), indexed globally
Search terms moved: “x” and “messenger”
Release date: The 19th of May

Search term: “messenger”

Vietnam

App Rank Change

Positions improved for 8 search terms, and 4 new ones were indexed. Most of the remaining long-tail search terms were already present in the Keywords field, except for “kids” and “life.”

Brazil

App Rank Change

We observed improved rankings for 7 search terms and indexing for 5 new ones. Notably, terms such as “signal,” “private,” and “viber” were not previously included in the app’s metadata.

Israel

App Rank Change

We recorded growth for 2 search terms and indexing for 1 new term. The term “Facebook” was not included in the metadata.

United States

App Rank Change

We observed ranking improvements for 14 search terms and indexing for 2 new ones. Terms like “session,” “skred,” “threema,” “kik,” “unseen,” “msn,” “life,” “lite,” and “zangi” were not present in the metadata—indicating that nearly two-thirds of the long-tail search terms had not been previously targeted.

Ukraine

App Rank Change

We saw growth for 1 search term and indexing for 1 new term.

Portugal

App Rank Change

We saw an improvement by 1 position for an existing search term and indexing for 2 new terms. The keyword “Facebook” was not present in the metadata.

Hong Kong

App Rank Change

Rankings improved for 1 search term, and 4 new terms were indexed. Notably, “Facebook” and “kids” were not included in the metadata.

Canada

App Rank Change

Rankings improved for 11 search terms, with 7 new terms indexed. Notably, keywords such as “zangi,” “botim,” “lite,” “kid,” “kids,” “update,” “fb,” and “facebook” were previously absent from the metadata — revealing that about half of the long-tail search terms were newly discovered.

While we could analyze each country individually, the examples above provide sufficient insights for our conclusions.

Search term: “x”

Vietnam

App Rank Change

We observed growth for 3 search terms and indexing for 6 new ones. Notably, terms like “twitter,” “max10,” and “mạng xã hội” were absent from the metadata, although “twitter” appeared in a cross-locale context.

Brazil

App Rank Change

We saw growth for 3 search terms and indexing for 8 new ones. Keywords such as “Twitter,” “video,” “xml,” “com,” “m,” and “von” were not included in the metadata.

Israel

App Rank Change

Rankings improved for 2 search terms. The keyword “m” was not included in the metadata.

United States

App Rank Change

We observed growth for 7 search terms and indexing for 2 new ones. Keywords such as “Corp,” «برنامج”,» “منصة”, “تلگرام» and “twitter” were absent from the metadata.

Ukraine

App Rank Change

Growth was seen for 1 search term, with 1 new term indexed. The keyword “Телеграм” was not included in the metadata but appeared in a cross-locale context.

Portugal

App Rank Change

Growth occurred for 1 search term, with 1 new term indexed. The keyword “Twitter” was not present in the metadata but appeared in a cross-locale context.

Hong Kong

App Rank Change

Growth was observed for 1 search term, with 2 new terms indexed. The keyword “Twitter” was covered in a cross-locale, whereas “wallet” was missing from the metadata.

Canada

App Rank Change

Rankings improved for 1 search term, with 2 new terms indexed. The keyword “Twitter” was present in a cross-locale context.

Me QR

Locale: Vietnamese (for the Vietnam region)
Moved search term: “mã vạch”
Release date: The 28th of May

App Rank Change

Indexed for 3 new long-tail search terms. However, rankings for two terms dropped, and one term completely disappeared (OUT).Terms such as “tải,” “phần,” “mềm,” “ứng,” and “dụng” were absent in the metadata.

OTOMOTO

Locale: Polish (for Poland)
Moved search term: “samochody”
Release date: The 7th of May

App Rank Change

Ranking improved by 13 positions following the release.

Conclusions

The Title field remains the most important factor influencing an app’s ranking in search results.

In all tested cases, moving search terms into the Title had a positive impact. Additionally, when a moved search term was part of a longer phrase, we observed two scenarios: indexing of phrases where parts appeared in cross-locales (which is unusual since keyword combinations are usually formed within a single locale), and cases where parts of the phrases were entirely missing from the metadata.

For search phrases fully included in the Title field, we observed exclusively positive ranking improvements.

Even more insights from ASO & UA pros in ASO Busters on Discord!

← Previous experimentNext Experiment →

Skill Swap & Expertise Hub

Boost Your App
Please fill in the form below and we'll call you back in no time.
Your request has been received! We'll be in touch shortly
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Boost Your App