Text ASO Increases Views by 96% and Downloads by 115% in a Month in the E-Books Library Niche – How to Do It

Service:
Sector:
Leisure
Author:
Published:
November 27, 2023
Team:
Iryna Kuznietsova
ASO Specialist
Olha Hrek
ASO Team Lead
Maxim Melnik
Head of ASO at RadASO
Kateryna Bukharova
Project Manager

The competition among mobile developers in several niches reached its peak in 2023. The RadASO team has prepared an example of managing new results in the highly competitive niche of romance literature library mobile apps using Text ASO.

"

The Client

The library mobile app for romance literature with a wide range of books in the App Store. A user can choose any of the free e-books, read both online and offline, and set the app’s interface to their preferences. Readers can also add favorite books to their personal library and receive suggestions about the selection of new books.

The brand name – private.

The Goal

To expand the app’s coverage, improve its visibility, and increase the number of downloads.

The Challenge

High competition in the sector: over 200 competitors were detected.

The Solution

Note. The RadASO’s own technical solution RadASO Tech Boosted Solution and the team’s expertise allow us to make a complex analysis in the client’s niche comprehensively and quickly.

Step 1. Selected relevant keywords and created the main competitor database according to them. The main selection criterion is the same functionality. The tool also allows to segment competitors into the following categories (for further analysis of the semantic core):

  • 100% competitor (very similar apps);
  • Indirect (closely relevant apps);
  • Maybe (At this stage, we do not consider them competitors, but further work may be required);
  • Not competitor (non-competitors).

Step 2. Analyzed the competitors and their strategies for promotion. The most important point is to find out from which countries they have the largest number of downloads and income. The information will give an idea of which countries we should target.

The list of additional topics for estimation:

  1. Which apps in the niche get the most downloads and profits?
  2. What locations do they use?
  3. How is the metadata set up?
  4. What are the traffic dynamics in the niche over the past year?

Here is the data based on the competitors’ statistics:

Step 3. Determined the location. The analysis showed the USA has the largest market share in the sector - over 70% of income. In addition, the other locations were selected: English (U.S.), English (U.K.), Spanish (Mexico), Russian, Arabic, and Chinese (Simplified). We also added the English (U.K.) localization, which is available in almost all countries (see the localization coverage table).

Step 4. Collected the semantic core for the most relevant keywords. The team guessed which searches users could potentially use to search our app and which ones should be ranked.

RadASO Tech Boosted Solution collects the following categories automatically:

  • key searches of competitors by which they are ranked;
  • titles and subtitles of our competitors (which contain relevant key searches);
  • search tips from the feed.

Step 5. Prepared metadata for approved localizations using the RadASO Tech Boosted Solution. There is a strategy we have developed:

  • Selected the most relevant key searches for the Title.
  • Covered the searches we are interested in the Keywords or Subtitle fields that create links with the ones in the Title. For instance, the key search is "Romance books online". In this case, "Romance" and "books" were used in the title. Then "online" was covered in one of the remaining fields - Keywords or Subtitle.
  • Next, we sorted all searches from the semantic core by their popularity and identified the most relevant, for which we would like to get rankings. Then we added them to the metadata.
Note. RadASO Tech Boosted Solution allows filtering searches by different parameters: SAP (Search Ads Popularity – the popularity of the search), EDI (Estimated Daily Impressions – expected number of views per day), the current position of the app on a specific search, the best position, the top-10 of competitors, the total number of apps in the search results, the entry of a request in other locations operating in a given country, etc.

Next, the team analyzes each search and decides which ones should be added to the metadata. Firstly, we add general key searches and then the competitor’s brands (they usually have low conversion rates).

Step 6. Replacing key searches. A few days after the release, we analyzed the positions that we managed to get. The key searches that did not provide the desired positions (*or were low despite the popularity of the search) were replaced with previously non-covered ones. This is how we prepared the second iteration of metadata.

*For instance, the 6th position from SAP 25 can manage views and downloads for the app. However, the same position from SAP 25 may not provide the desired results. So the RadASO team replaces the present key searches with the other ones.

The Results

1. Growth of positions in the US (most popular searches SAP>5):

2. The growth of the organic traffic in the USA

The number of views:

The number of downloads:

3. The positions’ growth in other countries (popular searches SAP>5)

On the EDI chart below, we can see the rapid growth of visibility for new positions in the USA, due to which the app began to receive the largest number of views.

Note. The EDI chart is an internal development of the RadASO that allows the convenient analysis and demonstration of the number of views obtained by the mobile app for a particular search.

4. The growth of the organic traffic in other countries. Despite the USA, it was managed to increase the amount of views in other countries, where the English U.K. localization operates:

5. The number of downloads in the countries mentioned on the chart has also increased:

To sum up, there is a number of views and downloads on the chart of the 30 days before and after release:

Campaign
Expenditure
Impressions
Taps
Installs
TTR
CR
Installs/Impr
Avg CPT
Avg CPA
Common term
-65.64%
-49.85%
-64.01%
-63.52%
-1.69%
0.81%
-0.98%
-5.13%
-6.06%
Data collection
-44.45%
-29.55%
-44.22%
-50.2%
-0.7%
-6.39%
-0.6%
0%
11.65%
Competitors brand
98.56%
80.41%
103.76%
92.01%
0.38%
-3.58%
0.12%
-2.38%
2.94%
Our brand
21.39%
23.01%
33.84%
32.65%
3.14%
-0.72%
2.27%
-8.33%
-6.82%
Discovery
-100%
-100%
-100%
-100%
-3.61%
-30.16%
-1.09%
-100%
-100%
Total
-0.6%
7.92%
11.72%
12.3%
0.2%
0.35%
0.16%
-11.36%
-12.31%
Group
Spend, $ %
Impressions %
Taps %
Installs %
Installs/Impr October, %
Installs/Impr November, %
Installs/Impr %
Avg CPT, $ %
Avg CPA, $ %
Competitor 1
42,98
83,11
63,3
50,48
3,74
3,08
-0,66
-12,2
-5,66
Common term
3,26
-3,73
3,92
26,67
0,57
0,75
0,18
0
-18,8
Competitors brand
120,26
59,82
47,02
0
0,49
0,31
-0,18
47,37
119,4
Data collection
15,12
-0,55
0,36
73,33
0,5
0,86
0,36
13,73
-33,51
Competitor 2
0,27
13,2
8,47
10,11
1,12
1,09
-0,03
-6,56
-9,02
Competitor 3
21,51
-2,06
-6,67
-8,33
0,43
0,4
-0,03
32
32,95
Our brand
3 575,62
3 646,79
3 544,9
3 553,66
37,61
36,68
-0,93
0
0
Competitor 4
-29,36
-35,77
-24,07
-33,7
0,61
0,63
0,02
-7,46
6,25
Relevant Competitors
69,42
26,03
51,35
48,95
6,3
7,45
1,15
12,2
14,29
Competitor 5
32,21
17,63
57,48
53,16
1,71
2,23
0,51
-15,71
-13,77
Competitor 6
-9,31
9,42
22,92
17,89
5,3
5,71
0,41
-27,08
-23,44
Total
33,96%
13,44%
87,29%
127,08%
1,36%
2,73%
1,37%
-29,09%
-40,74%
Custom region
Impressions
Units
1/7/2021 - 1/15/2021
1/16/2021 - 1/24/2021
Change
%
MoM
1/7/2021 - 1/15/2021
1/16/2021 - 1/24/2021
Change
%
MoM
United States
12 970
39 436
26 466
204 %
88 220
1 116
1 904
788
71 %
2 627
UK + Ireland
8 731
10 197
1 466
17 %
4 887
438
462
24
5 %
80
Germany + AT + CH + LU
1 974
6 235
4 261
216 %
14 203
203
291
88
43 %
293
France
1 500
4 390
2 890
193 %
9 633
182
237
55
30 %
183
Netherlands / Belgium
1 593
3 599
2 006
126 %
6 687
159
201
42
26 %
140
Ukraine
697
4 010
3 313
475 %
11 043
85
189
104
122 %
347
Canada
2 569
3 614
1 045
41 %
3 483
145
178
33
23 %
110
Northern Europe
1 273
2 024
751
59 %
2 503
117
175
58
50 %
193
Australia + NZ
1 754
3 324
1 570
90 %
5 233
137
160
23
17 %
77
Vietnam
352
2 712
2 360
670 %
7 867
32
144
112
350 %
373
Thailand
679
2 016
1 337
197 %
4 457
57
142
85
149 %
283
Arabic World
268
1 745
1 477
551 %
4 923
40
119
79
198 %
263
Spain
844
2 058
1 214
144 %
4 047
78
108
30
38 %
100
Eastern Europe
458
1 070
612
134 %
2 040
63
95
32
51 %
107
Italy
826
2 145
1 319
160 %
4 397
77
94
17
22 %
57
Turkey
338
2 309
1 971
583 %
6 570
34
87
53
156 %
177
Rest of World
426
1 457
1 031
242 %
3 437
48
81
33
69 %
110
Japan
553
5 113
4 560
825 %
15 200
18
80
62
344 %
207
India
234
1 169
935
400 %
3 117
15
75
60
400 %
200
Brazil
294
1 332
1 038
353 %
3 460
34
67
33
97 %
110
Hispanic America
318
784
466
147 %
1 553
42
51
9
21 %
30
Indonesia
206
525
319
155 %
1 063
20
41
21
105 %
70
Korea (South)
308
2 055
1 747
567 %
5 823
22
36
14
64 %
47
Malaysia
119
663
544
457 %
1 813
11
27
16
145 %
53
Taiwan + HK + Macau
145
532
387
267 %
1 290
9
24
15
167 %
50
Rest of Europe
82
287
205
250 %
683
12
22
10
83 %
33
Portugal
17
273
256
1 506 %
853
2
18
16
800 %
53
Israel
23
120
97
422 %
323
3
9
6
200 %
20
China / Singapore
78
134
56
72 %
187
6
7
1
17 %
3
Total
39 629
105 328
65 699
166 %
218 997
3 205
5 124
1 919
60 %
6 397

Conclusion

So, in the process, we involved additional localizations and used general popular keywords when creating metadata. Moreover, after the first iteration, we removed the keys that didn't get high rankings from the metadata and replaced them with new ones.

As a result, after ASO optimization, the app achieved new positions for relevant searches. Then, we had a significant increase in organic views and downloads after iterations in countries with updated metadata, as well as in countries affected by English (UK) and English (US). So, we received a 96% increase in views and a 115% increase in downloads within 30 days in all countries.

More Case Studies

Home
Up