How to Increase Google Play Conversion Without a Full Redesign: The eSIM Plus Case Study

Service:
Sector:
Utility
Author:
Published:
December 10, 2025
Team:
Oleksii Stenhach
ASO Specialist

Improving conversion is easy when a product has weak visuals. But what do you do when the store page already looks good and there are no obvious issues? That was exactly the situation we faced when we began working with eSIM Plus — a service that provides mobile connectivity without the need for a physical SIM card.

In this case study, we explain how analysis, strong hypotheses, and a series of experiments helped us identify growth opportunities, enhance visuals, and achieve a measurable increase in the conversion rate from page views to installs.

"

About Our Partner

eSIM Plus is a service by Appvillis UAB that has been helping people around the world stay connected to mobile networks and the internet since 2019 — all without a physical SIM card, thanks to embedded SIM (eSIM) technology.

Objective of the Promotion

Increase the conversion rate from app page views to installs on Google Play.

Key Challenges

  1. Before we started, no graphic tests had been conducted on Google Play, so we had no data on which visual elements actually motivated users to install the app
  2. Identifying growth opportunities was also challenging because the existing visuals were already well-optimized.

Team Actions

With this in mind, we built our strategy around three key stages:

  1. Selecting the right tools
  2. Analyzing the existing visuals and developing new ones
  3. A/B testing and evaluating results

Step 1. Choosing the Testing Approach

To improve conversion, we first needed to define which graphics testing format would provide broad reach and reliable insights.

We considered using Custom Store Listing — allowing us to create alternative app page versions tailored to different user groups.

However, this approach wouldn’t achieve the needed effect: the available traffic and search queries on Google Play were too broad, mostly centered on “eSIM.” It wasn’t possible to segment the audience in a way that would yield clear, actionable test results.

Therefore, we decided to test graphics directly — through A/B-tests on the main Google Play page.

This allowed many users to see the new variations and provided us with statistically meaningful data quickly.

Step 2. Analysis and Visual Improvements

App Icon

The original icon had a modern look to it but contained textual elements of relatively short proportions that easily got lost among other apps in the store.

We preserved the brand style but enlarged the logo, making the text more noticeable and readable in search results, while the icon itself also looked cleaner and less cluttered with details.

App Screenshots

The gray background with dark imagery looked neat, but we identified several opportunities for improvement:

  • The first screenshot could more effectively emphasize the main benefit: worldwide service availability
  • Text and device mockups weren’t aligned, making the composition feel less cohesive
  • The bottom of the phone mockups was cropped, giving the impression that content was missing

Screenshots before:

Screenshots after:

In the updated version, we highlighted what matters to the user in the first few seconds:

  • A bold “Worldwide” headline instantly communicates global coverage
  • The hand holding the phone adds a human touch and gives a more modern, lively impression
  • Mockups are simplified and free of visual clutter
  • Phones are fully visible across all screenshots, with neatly aligned texts — making the page look more polished and professional

Step 3. A/B Testing the Graphics

To assess the impact of each visual element, we ran two A/B tests — one for the icon and one for the screenshots.

Google Play split the audience 50/50, showing users either the original page or the updated version. Conversion was measured by the number of installs following a page view.

Icon Test

The updated icon consistently outperformed the original, ultimately driving a 6.15% increase in conversion by the end of the test.

Screenshot Test

The updated screenshots also delivered consistently better results, outperforming the original by 9.85% by the end of the test.

Results

To assess the true impact of the updated visuals, we compared conversion rates in the Explore channel — organic search from non-branded queries, where visuals and messaging play a key role in user selection.

We analyzed two equal-length time periods:

  • Before the tests (Aug 21–28) — 23.81%
  • After implementing the new graphics (Sep 20–27) — 25.44%

Final conversion growth: +1.63%

There’s an unwritten rule in ASO: to achieve a noticeable conversion uplift, the new visuals often need to be significantly different from the originals.

The eSIM Plus case shows that this is not always the case. Here, targeted yet thoughtful adjustments delivered measurable results: strong primary messaging, simplified layouts, a more impactful first screenshot — and that was enough to boost conversion.

The key is to not fear, but embrace revisiting your visuals, along with continuously validating hypotheses, and avoiding making decisions solely based on taste or habit. Sometimes, small improvements combined with systematic testing can deliver the results typically expected from a full redesign.

Campaign
Expenditure
Impressions
Taps
Installs
TTR
CR
Installs/Impr
Avg CPT
Avg CPA
Common term
-65.64%
-49.85%
-64.01%
-63.52%
-1.69%
0.81%
-0.98%
-5.13%
-6.06%
Data collection
-44.45%
-29.55%
-44.22%
-50.2%
-0.7%
-6.39%
-0.6%
0%
11.65%
Competitors brand
98.56%
80.41%
103.76%
92.01%
0.38%
-3.58%
0.12%
-2.38%
2.94%
Our brand
21.39%
23.01%
33.84%
32.65%
3.14%
-0.72%
2.27%
-8.33%
-6.82%
Discovery
-100%
-100%
-100%
-100%
-3.61%
-30.16%
-1.09%
-100%
-100%
Total
-0.6%
7.92%
11.72%
12.3%
0.2%
0.35%
0.16%
-11.36%
-12.31%
Group
Spend, $ %
Impressions %
Taps %
Installs %
Installs/Impr October, %
Installs/Impr November, %
Installs/Impr %
Avg CPT, $ %
Avg CPA, $ %
Competitor 1
42,98
83,11
63,3
50,48
3,74
3,08
-0,66
-12,2
-5,66
Common term
3,26
-3,73
3,92
26,67
0,57
0,75
0,18
0
-18,8
Competitors brand
120,26
59,82
47,02
0
0,49
0,31
-0,18
47,37
119,4
Data collection
15,12
-0,55
0,36
73,33
0,5
0,86
0,36
13,73
-33,51
Competitor 2
0,27
13,2
8,47
10,11
1,12
1,09
-0,03
-6,56
-9,02
Competitor 3
21,51
-2,06
-6,67
-8,33
0,43
0,4
-0,03
32
32,95
Our brand
3 575,62
3 646,79
3 544,9
3 553,66
37,61
36,68
-0,93
0
0
Competitor 4
-29,36
-35,77
-24,07
-33,7
0,61
0,63
0,02
-7,46
6,25
Relevant Competitors
69,42
26,03
51,35
48,95
6,3
7,45
1,15
12,2
14,29
Competitor 5
32,21
17,63
57,48
53,16
1,71
2,23
0,51
-15,71
-13,77
Competitor 6
-9,31
9,42
22,92
17,89
5,3
5,71
0,41
-27,08
-23,44
Total
33,96%
13,44%
87,29%
127,08%
1,36%
2,73%
1,37%
-29,09%
-40,74%
Custom region
Impressions
Units
1/7/2021 - 1/15/2021
1/16/2021 - 1/24/2021
Change
%
MoM
1/7/2021 - 1/15/2021
1/16/2021 - 1/24/2021
Change
%
MoM
United States
12 970
39 436
26 466
204 %
88 220
1 116
1 904
788
71 %
2 627
UK + Ireland
8 731
10 197
1 466
17 %
4 887
438
462
24
5 %
80
Germany + AT + CH + LU
1 974
6 235
4 261
216 %
14 203
203
291
88
43 %
293
France
1 500
4 390
2 890
193 %
9 633
182
237
55
30 %
183
Netherlands / Belgium
1 593
3 599
2 006
126 %
6 687
159
201
42
26 %
140
Ukraine
697
4 010
3 313
475 %
11 043
85
189
104
122 %
347
Canada
2 569
3 614
1 045
41 %
3 483
145
178
33
23 %
110
Northern Europe
1 273
2 024
751
59 %
2 503
117
175
58
50 %
193
Australia + NZ
1 754
3 324
1 570
90 %
5 233
137
160
23
17 %
77
Vietnam
352
2 712
2 360
670 %
7 867
32
144
112
350 %
373
Thailand
679
2 016
1 337
197 %
4 457
57
142
85
149 %
283
Arabic World
268
1 745
1 477
551 %
4 923
40
119
79
198 %
263
Spain
844
2 058
1 214
144 %
4 047
78
108
30
38 %
100
Eastern Europe
458
1 070
612
134 %
2 040
63
95
32
51 %
107
Italy
826
2 145
1 319
160 %
4 397
77
94
17
22 %
57
Turkey
338
2 309
1 971
583 %
6 570
34
87
53
156 %
177
Rest of World
426
1 457
1 031
242 %
3 437
48
81
33
69 %
110
Japan
553
5 113
4 560
825 %
15 200
18
80
62
344 %
207
India
234
1 169
935
400 %
3 117
15
75
60
400 %
200
Brazil
294
1 332
1 038
353 %
3 460
34
67
33
97 %
110
Hispanic America
318
784
466
147 %
1 553
42
51
9
21 %
30
Indonesia
206
525
319
155 %
1 063
20
41
21
105 %
70
Korea (South)
308
2 055
1 747
567 %
5 823
22
36
14
64 %
47
Malaysia
119
663
544
457 %
1 813
11
27
16
145 %
53
Taiwan + HK + Macau
145
532
387
267 %
1 290
9
24
15
167 %
50
Rest of Europe
82
287
205
250 %
683
12
22
10
83 %
33
Portugal
17
273
256
1 506 %
853
2
18
16
800 %
53
Israel
23
120
97
422 %
323
3
9
6
200 %
20
China / Singapore
78
134
56
72 %
187
6
7
1
17 %
3
Total
39 629
105 328
65 699
166 %
218 997
3 205
5 124
1 919
60 %
6 397

More Case Studies

Home
Up
Boost Your App
Please fill in the form below and we'll call you back in no time.